|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Help:Council Room/header}} | + | <nowiki>{{delete/Abusing page creation}}</nowiki> |
| − | | + | |
| | | | |
| | <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> | | <!-- DO NOT EDIT ABOVE THIS LINE --> |
| − | == This is a test == | + | == This is NOT a test == |
| − | | + | |
| − | Testing out the new <s>discussion page</s> Council Room. [[User:TwiNight|TwiNight]] ([[User talk:TwiNight|talk]]) 05:09, 13 November 2012 (EST)
| + | |
| − | : Testing helpful comment on testing of new discussion page [[User:DStu|DStu]] ([[User talk:DStu|talk]]) 09:12, 13 November 2012 (EST)
| + | |
| − | :: testing <s> replying to a reply</s> double-indenting and striking out. And signing. [[User:Jking|Jking]] ([[User talk:Jking|talk]]) 01:11, 19 February 2016 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Editing crossposted articles ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | What is the editing policy with regard to strategy articles imported from the blog/forum? E.g., if I spot a typo or misspelling in the wiki, should I fix it or should I leave it as it is to preserve the post as it was originally? [[Special:Contributions/186.221.80.237|186.221.80.237]] 08:31, 9 December 2012 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Editing is fine. This should be the ressource of "correct" data, so if you find something that is outdated or simply wrong, then feel free to correct it. --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 08:51, 9 December 2012 (EST)
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | I was wondering the same thing, if we could even heavily edit the articles and merely cite the thread/web page the article came from. Sometimes the wording and sections aren't quite "wiki-like" and could use some "wikification" at the expense of the exact wording of the original article. Thoughts? -[[User:Thirtyseven|Thirtyseven]] ([[User talk:Thirtyseven|talk]]) 19:21, 10 December 2012 (EST)
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | I think that's appropriate. Heck, a bunch of the earlier articles probably can be updated to talk about interactions with new cards and such anyway, and the community's certainly gotten better since the early days. The posted articles should be the starting point, but not necessarily the final version, that's why they're on the wiki. The original will stay on the blog. [[User:Ftl ftw|Ftl ftw]] ([[User talk:Ftl ftw|talk]]) 20:05, 10 December 2012 (EST)
| + | BORK BORK BORK BORK BORK |
| | | | |
| − | I 'Wikified' {{Card|Develop}} recently! [[Special:Contributions/74.102.70.142|74.102.70.142]] 07:55, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
| + | == Editing TROLLED articles == |
| | | | |
| − | == Trivia regarding card names ==
| + | TROLOLOLOLOOOO |
| | | | |
| − | I found these posts on BoardGameGeek where Donald X talks about some cards and how their names came about:
| + | TROLOL |
| | | | |
| − | http://boardgamegeek.com/article/5433149#5433149
| + | HOHOHOHO |
| − | http://boardgamegeek.com/article/7789338#7789338
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | Would it be OK to include in the Trivia section of their respective articles?
| + | TROLOLO |
| | | | |
| − | [[User:Pedro LM|Pedro LM]] ([[User talk:Pedro LM|talk]]) 18:02, 4 January 2013 (EST)
| + | == Trivia TROLLING card names == |
| | | | |
| − | :Of course, go for it! -[[User:Thirtyseven|Thirtyseven]] ([[User talk:Thirtyseven|talk]]) 15:50, 5 January 2013 (EST)
| + | TROLLERCARD125651651732 |
| | | | |
| − | == Fan Cards ==
| + | TROLLED |
| | | | |
| − | Is there a policy regarding posting of fan cards to the strategy wiki? I personally don't think it is appropriate for the strategy wiki since it is about Dominion, and fan cards, technically, are not Dominion. However, if you want to avoid this, I think it would be appropriate to put something on the main page indicating this. That way you have something concrete to point to when someone steps over the line. --[[User:Murphy|Murphy]] ([[User talk:Murphy|talk]]) 13:33, 16 February 2015 (EST)
| + | == HUECards == |
| − | *If someone wants to start a wiki dedicated to fan cards, that would probably be the best way to do things. Alternatively informing people to create a forum post and linking to it from the Fan Card page could also be a decent alternative.
| + | |
| | | | |
| − | == CAPTCHA ==
| + | HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE |
| | | | |
| − | Good that you are using QuestyCaptcha, but IMHO the questions are too hard. As someone who played Dominion several times, but does not own all decks etc., I needed multiple tries and I finally succeeded only because I found a question whose answer I could find with a search in the wiki. QuestyCaptcha questions should only be hard enough to be impossible for a bot to solve, rather than so hard as to discriminate between ''people''. It might be ok to have harder questions as long as they can all be solved by a simple search in the wiki, so I suggest you go through the questions to check they can. --[[User:Nemo bis|Nemo bis]] ([[User talk:Nemo bis|talk]]) 04:59, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
| + | == CARS == |
| | | | |
| − | : All the QuestyCaptcha answers can be found on the wiki, I was stuck at "Which card type is red?" and found [[shelter]]! [[Special:Contributions/74.102.70.142|74.102.70.142]] 08:00, 15 August 2015 (EDT)
| + | LAZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORR |
| | | | |
| − | == Today's vandalism == | + | == Today's GOOD EDITION == |
| | | | |
| | AUTOBLANKED AND AUTOTROLLED | | AUTOBLANKED AND AUTOTROLLED |
