Editing Strictly better
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Since there are cards that reward deck diversity, it can be argued that there is no card that is in ''all'' cases strictly better than another: for example, even though Bazaar provides all the effects Village does plus extra {{Cost|}}, there can still be cases when gaining a Village will increase the value of your {{Card|Fairgrounds}} and gaining a Bazaar won't. | Since there are cards that reward deck diversity, it can be argued that there is no card that is in ''all'' cases strictly better than another: for example, even though Bazaar provides all the effects Village does plus extra {{Cost|}}, there can still be cases when gaining a Village will increase the value of your {{Card|Fairgrounds}} and gaining a Bazaar won't. | ||
− | Similarly, cards that care about card cost may make cards that are usually worse better in specific cases: for example, {{Card|Village}} may be more useful than {{Card|Worker's Village}} if you have {{Card|Forge}} with a disposable | + | Similarly, cards that care about card cost may make cards that are usually worse better in specific cases: for example, {{Card|Village}} may be more useful than {{Card|Worker's Village}} if you have {{Card|Forge}} with a disposable $5 card. Therefore, when people say that one card is '''strictly better''' than another, they often mean that it has a strictly better effect. |
== Implications for card design == | == Implications for card design == |