Editing Strictly better
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | A card in Dominion is informally referred to as '''strictly better''' than another if, in some sense, having or using the former confers all the same advantages as the latter as well as some added benefit, with no potential additional disadvantages. A typical reason this might happen is if one card provides more +{{Cost|}}, +Buy, +Action, or {{VP}} than another but otherwise has the same effect, since under ordinary circumstances there is no way those additional effects can harm the player. For example, {{Card|Bazaar}} is strictly better than {{Card|Village}} because the effect of Bazaar is the same as that of Village plus {{Cost|1}}. Another way one card might be strictly better than another is if it offers the effect of the other as one of two or more options. For instance, once in your deck, {{Card|Count}} is better than {{Card|Mandarin}} since Mandarin's effect is one of the nine choices Count makes available: thus all the benefits of Mandarin are present, but in cases where the effect of Mandarin would be disadvantageous, Count makes other options available and Mandarin doesn't. {{Card|Alchemist}} is strictly better than {{Card|Laboratory}} because it has exactly the same effect when played, and also may give you the ''option'' of top-decking it instead of discarding it | + | A card in Dominion is informally referred to as '''strictly better''' than another if, in some sense, having or using the former confers all the same advantages as the latter as well as some added benefit, with no potential additional disadvantages. A typical reason this might happen is if one card provides more +{{Cost|}}, +Buy, +Action, or {{VP}} than another but otherwise has the same effect, since under ordinary circumstances there is no way those additional effects can harm the player. For example, {{Card|Bazaar}} is strictly better than {{Card|Village}} because the effect of Bazaar is the same as that of Village plus {{Cost|1}}. Another way one card might be strictly better than another is if it offers the effect of the other as one of two or more options. For instance, once in your deck, {{Card|Count}} is better than {{Card|Mandarin}} since Mandarin's effect is one of the nine choices Count makes available: thus all the benefits of Mandarin are present, but in cases where the effect of Mandarin would be disadvantageous, Count makes other options available and Mandarin doesn't. {{Card|Alchemist}} is strictly better than {{Card|Laboratory}} because it has exactly the same effect when played, and also may give you the ''option'' of top-decking it instead of discarding it. |
− | There are numerous cases where a card has an additional effect that is ''usually'' beneficial, but in some cases may turn out to be harmful; whether such cards are considered "strictly better" may depend on context. For example, although [[draw | + | There are numerous cases where a card has an additional effect that is ''usually'' beneficial, but in some cases may turn out to be harmful; whether such cards are considered "strictly better" may depend on context. For example, although [[draw]]ing an additional card is usually desirable, it can also cause a terminal [[collision]] or a [[reshuffle]] at an inopportune time, so a card like {{card|Village}} may not be considered "strictly" better than a card like {{card|Necropolis}} for this reason in some analyses. More complicated situations also exist: for example, {{Card|Harem}} has the same effect as {{Card|Silver}} when played and is worth 2{{VP}} more, so it might be considered strictly better than Silver; but possessing a Harem in your deck may allow you to be given a {{Card|Curse}} by an opponent's {{Card|Jester}}, which Silver would not. Similarly, {{Card|Goons}} differs from {{Card|Woodcutter}} by providing both +{{VP}} and a [[discard attack]] and would in most contexts be considered strictly better, but the discard attack could help an opponent by enabling their {{Card|Tunnel}} or {{Card|Menagerie}}. {{Card|Great Hall}} is usually strictly better than {{Card|Estate}} since Great Hall may be played as a [[cantrip]], but in a deck with {{Card|Baron}}, Estate may be more beneficial. |
− | As the range of effects possible on Dominion cards increases, the ways those effects can fail to be uniformly "strictly" better than each other also increases. {{ | + | As the range of effects possible on Dominion cards increases, the ways those effects can fail to be uniformly "strictly" better than each other also increases. {{card|Storyteller}} allows you to convert +{{cost}} into +Cards, so if an increase in card draw isn't a strict improvement then in the presence of Storyteller neither is an increase in +{{cost|}}. {{card|Diadem}} converts +Actions into +{{cost}}, so in the presence of Diadem ''and'' Storyteller, an increase in +Actions isn't a strict improvement either. This emphasizes that the "strictly better" concept is itself an informal rough heuristic for comparing cards to each other, not a well-defined description. |
Since there are cards that reward deck diversity, it can be argued that there is no card that is in ''all'' cases strictly better than another: for example, even though Bazaar provides all the effects Village does plus extra {{Cost|}}, there can still be cases when gaining a Village will increase the value of your {{Card|Fairgrounds}} and gaining a Bazaar won't. | Since there are cards that reward deck diversity, it can be argued that there is no card that is in ''all'' cases strictly better than another: for example, even though Bazaar provides all the effects Village does plus extra {{Cost|}}, there can still be cases when gaining a Village will increase the value of your {{Card|Fairgrounds}} and gaining a Bazaar won't. | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
There are a few cases of Kingdom cards that are sometimes referred to as ''almost'' strictly better at the same price: | There are a few cases of Kingdom cards that are sometimes referred to as ''almost'' strictly better at the same price: | ||
− | * | + | * Count is strictly better than Mandarin once in your deck; however, Mandarin has an on-gain effect that is sometimes desirable. |
* {{Card|Hunting Party}} is better than {{Card|Laboratory}} in most decks that don't have very many copies of strong [[Treasure|Treasures]] or [[terminal]] Actions. | * {{Card|Hunting Party}} is better than {{Card|Laboratory}} in most decks that don't have very many copies of strong [[Treasure|Treasures]] or [[terminal]] Actions. | ||
* {{Card|Noble Brigand}} is better than {{Card|Thief}} except when gaining {{Card|Copper}} is desirable or special Treasure cards abound. | * {{Card|Noble Brigand}} is better than {{Card|Thief}} except when gaining {{Card|Copper}} is desirable or special Treasure cards abound. | ||
− | + | Copper is in general strictly better than {{Card|Abandoned Mine}}, and Copper and all [[Ruins]] are in general strictly better than {{Card|Curse}}; but these are a special case since they cost {{Cost|0}} and are so rarely likely to be bought anyway. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | Copper is in general strictly better than {{Card|Abandoned Mine}} | + | |
It is possible, however, for a card to be strictly better than one of the same cost ''in a particular Kingdom''. For example, in games with no [[non-terminal]] Action cards, {{Card|Conspirator}} is strictly worse than many [[terminal silver|terminal silvers]] costing {{Cost|3}} and {{Cost|4}}; in games in which {{ally|Desert Guides}} is the selected [[Ally]], {{card|Underling}} is strictly better than {{card|Guide}}. | It is possible, however, for a card to be strictly better than one of the same cost ''in a particular Kingdom''. For example, in games with no [[non-terminal]] Action cards, {{Card|Conspirator}} is strictly worse than many [[terminal silver|terminal silvers]] costing {{Cost|3}} and {{Cost|4}}; in games in which {{ally|Desert Guides}} is the selected [[Ally]], {{card|Underling}} is strictly better than {{card|Guide}}. | ||
{{Navbox Strategy}} | {{Navbox Strategy}} | ||
− |