Editing Talk:Knight

Can someone upload the card image of the randomizer card? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 09:40, 5 November 2012 (EST)

== Confusion about "Knights card" ==

I find this article a bit confusing and wonder if someone can rectify this? I haven't played Dark Ages yet, so only know what I know from this wiki.
When I followed the link from [[Dark_Ages#Kingdom_Cards|the list of Dark Ages Kingdom Cards]] I assumed "Knights" was a Kingdom card. Although I understand the concepts of the 10 different Knight cards, I assumed there was one additional "Knights" card especially because there is an image of one at the top of the article. Then the confusion grew because the text on that card didn't make any sense to me. (What exactly is the action and the attack?) And to add even more confustion the [[List of cards]] also lists "Knights" as a card (in addition to all 10 Knight cards).

Only after reading more and googling I found that there is no "Knights" card and whenever Knights are mentioned as part of the kingdom cards, it is about the Knights '''pile'''. I furthermore assume the card that is depicted is the randomizer card? If yes, that should be made clearer and can avoid confusion. Ideally some further clarification should also be added.

My suggestion, instead of
<blockquote>
[...] There are 10 differently-named unique Knights with a single randomizer card; [...] gained at any given time. 
</blockquote>

the introduction could read
<blockquote>
[...] There are 10 differently-named unique Knights; [...] gained at any given time. The whole pile is represented by a single randomizer card (as depicted on this page).
</blockquote>

More changes could be to add the word "pile" whenever other pages talk about Knights (depending on context)?

--[[User:Selfthinker|Selfthinker]] ([[User talk:Selfthinker|talk]]) 13:11, 30 January 2016 (EST)

:I agree that this page gives the impression that [[Knights]] is an actual playable card.  The same argument also applies to [[Castles]].  I have removed both from the [[List of cards]].  --[[User:Julesreid|Julesreid]] ([[User talk:Julesreid|talk]]) 16:44, 3 December 2017 (EST)

== Knight + Throne? ==

How do knights work with [[Throne Room]]?  Suppose I play throne room and then a knight, and on the first play of my knight, I trash another knight.  Since that causes my knight to be trashed, does that mean that I can't play it a second time? [[User:Mxdata|Mxdata]] ([[User talk:Mxdata|talk]]) 01:01, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
:works as every self-trasher (Feast/Mining Village/...) although trashed you execute as much of its instructions as possible.
Latest revision		Your text
Line 27:		Line 27:

	How do knights work with [[Throne Room]]? Suppose I play throne room and then a knight, and on the first play of my knight, I trash another knight. Since that causes my knight to be trashed, does that mean that I can't play it a second time? [[User:Mxdata\|Mxdata]] ([[User talk:Mxdata\|talk]]) 01:01, 4 September 2019 (EDT)		How do knights work with [[Throne Room]]? Suppose I play throne room and then a knight, and on the first play of my knight, I trash another knight. Since that causes my knight to be trashed, does that mean that I can't play it a second time? [[User:Mxdata\|Mxdata]] ([[User talk:Mxdata\|talk]]) 01:01, 4 September 2019 (EDT)
−	:works as every self-trasher (Feast/Mining Village/...) although trashed you execute as much of its instructions as possible ~~also in second (third/fourth/~~.~~.) repetition. [[Special:Contributions/88.69.156.110\|88.69.156.110]] 04:26, 4 September 2019 (EDT)~~	+	:works as every self-trasher (Feast/Mining Village/...) although trashed you execute as much of its instructions as possible.