Talk:List of Cards by Qvist Rankings
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should we add the current ranking in the card box on the card detail page? -- [[User:Qvist|Qvist]] | Should we add the current ranking in the card box on the card detail page? -- [[User:Qvist|Qvist]] | ||
:Yes, I think that's a great idea. I was actually going to do this myself, but didn't know how to edit the card boxes. It would be great if the text that says "Rank" (or whatever it says) links to this page. -- [[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:11, 26 October 2012 (EDT) | :Yes, I think that's a great idea. I was actually going to do this myself, but didn't know how to edit the card boxes. It would be great if the text that says "Rank" (or whatever it says) links to this page. -- [[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:11, 26 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | ::Let's wait what other have to say. -- [[User:Qvist|Qvist]] | ||
What should this page be called? Feel free to move it if you have a better name for it, this is just the first thing I thought of. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:13, 26 October 2012 (EDT) | What should this page be called? Feel free to move it if you have a better name for it, this is just the first thing I thought of. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:13, 26 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | : I think names aren't that important now as long as they are consistent. So, this seems fine. -- [[User:Qvist|Qvist]] | ||
Revision as of 09:19, 26 October 2012
Should we add the current ranking in the card box on the card detail page? -- Qvist
- Yes, I think that's a great idea. I was actually going to do this myself, but didn't know how to edit the card boxes. It would be great if the text that says "Rank" (or whatever it says) links to this page. -- Schneau (talk) 09:11, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
- Let's wait what other have to say. -- Qvist
What should this page be called? Feel free to move it if you have a better name for it, this is just the first thing I thought of. --Schneau (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
- I think names aren't that important now as long as they are consistent. So, this seems fine. -- Qvist
