Talk:List of Cards by Qvist Rankings
Should we add the current ranking in the card box on the card detail page? -- Qvist
- Yes, I think that's a great idea. I was actually going to do this myself, but didn't know how to edit the card boxes. It would be great if the text that says "Rank" (or whatever it says) links to this page. -- Schneau (talk) 09:11, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
- Let's wait what other have to say. -- Qvist
What should this page be called? Feel free to move it if you have a better name for it, this is just the first thing I thought of. --Schneau (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
- I think names aren't that important now as long as they are consistent. So, this seems fine. -- Qvist
Would it make sense to sort by ranking instead of alphabetical? I guess latest ranking would make more sense. Also I think it would look better to change the columns to 2011 and 2012. --Jonts (talk) 21:18, 28 October 2012 (EDT)OK, just noticed the tables are sortable. That's cool. Maybe we could have it default to ranking then? --Jonts (talk) 01:38, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
- Pre-sorting doesn't work with CSS classes as far as I can see. I have to write a JS file and embed it on this page. Maybe I'll do that on a later stage. Renaming the columns is a good idea. --Qvist (talk) 04:06, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
- The polls on Qvist's profile are labeled 2012 Ed. 1 and 2012 Ed. 2. I see that the actual polling for Ed. 1 happened during 2011, so that's fine with me. We could pre-sort the lists by ranking by hand if we wanted to, or we could do Qvist's JS method. I was just sticking them in alphabetically because that made sense, but can easily sort them by rank instead. --Schneau (talk) 08:38, 29 October 2012 (EDT)
Nothing to do with the wiki, but I was thinking about the categories here and realized that technically possession should fall in the $6 or more category. Though obviously it would be silly to do so.--Jonts (talk) 16:04, 1 November 2012 (EDT)
