Talk:Merchant
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Collision et al) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Then you should create a ''new article'' about the phenomenon of ''desirably'' lining two things up in the same hand and link to that. First of all, you shouldn't link to an article on the wrong topic on the expectation that ''at some point'' it will be about the topic you mean; it makes it more confusing for readers in the interim. Second, as far as I can tell the vast majority of uses of the term "collision" on forum.dominionstrategy,com refers specifically to undesirably colliding two terminals. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 00:15, 3 April 2021 (EDT) | :Then you should create a ''new article'' about the phenomenon of ''desirably'' lining two things up in the same hand and link to that. First of all, you shouldn't link to an article on the wrong topic on the expectation that ''at some point'' it will be about the topic you mean; it makes it more confusing for readers in the interim. Second, as far as I can tell the vast majority of uses of the term "collision" on forum.dominionstrategy,com refers specifically to undesirably colliding two terminals. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 00:15, 3 April 2021 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: On the Dominion Discord, "collision" is used primarily to describe two cards lining up together ''desirably'' i.e. "colliding Tournament with Province" or "colliding Urchins turn 3". To signify an undesirable collision, the term "''terminal'' collision" is used as terminal collision is a more specific case of collision. I am against creating new pages because fewer pages with more content is more desirable than many pages with little content on them. I agree that making assumptions can be confusing to normal wiki readers, which is why creating strong concept pages should be a high priority. However, it is much simpler to do the two tasks asynchronously rather than waiting on one to start the other. [[User:Muenstercheese|Muenstercheese]] ([[User talk:Muenstercheese|talk]]) 00:42, 3 April 2021 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:42, 3 April 2021
Collision et al
I'm well aware the collision page as it is right now strictly means terminal collision, not "lining things up". Editing the collision page is on the todo list, and a lot of our page edits have been made assuming that the terms in them will be properly glossary'd later in the project. --Terracubist (talk) 19:17, 2 April 2021 (EDT)
- Then you should create a new article about the phenomenon of desirably lining two things up in the same hand and link to that. First of all, you shouldn't link to an article on the wrong topic on the expectation that at some point it will be about the topic you mean; it makes it more confusing for readers in the interim. Second, as far as I can tell the vast majority of uses of the term "collision" on forum.dominionstrategy,com refers specifically to undesirably colliding two terminals. Ajd (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
- On the Dominion Discord, "collision" is used primarily to describe two cards lining up together desirably i.e. "colliding Tournament with Province" or "colliding Urchins turn 3". To signify an undesirable collision, the term "terminal collision" is used as terminal collision is a more specific case of collision. I am against creating new pages because fewer pages with more content is more desirable than many pages with little content on them. I agree that making assumptions can be confusing to normal wiki readers, which is why creating strong concept pages should be a high priority. However, it is much simpler to do the two tasks asynchronously rather than waiting on one to start the other. Muenstercheese (talk) 00:42, 3 April 2021 (EDT)
