Editing Talk:Vanilla
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST) | Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
*I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --[[User:Drab Emordnilap|Drab Emordnilap]] ([[User talk:Drab Emordnilap|talk]]) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | *I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --[[User:Drab Emordnilap|Drab Emordnilap]] ([[User talk:Drab Emordnilap|talk]]) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
