Talk:Vanilla
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Werothegreat (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --[[User:Drab Emordnilap|Drab Emordnilap]] ([[User talk:Drab Emordnilap|talk]]) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | *I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --[[User:Drab Emordnilap|Drab Emordnilap]] ([[User talk:Drab Emordnilap|talk]]) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
::Agreed. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 11:51, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ::Agreed. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 11:51, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | ::: The definition I go with is "If there isn't text, it's Vanilla." This is how I include Kingdom Treasures. [[User:Werothegreat|Werothegreat]] ([[User talk:Werothegreat|talk]]) 23:00, 16 June 2013 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 23:00, 16 June 2013
Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --Qvist (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST)
- I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --Drab Emordnilap (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST)
- Agreed. Ajd (talk) 11:51, 5 November 2012 (EST)
- The definition I go with is "If there isn't text, it's Vanilla." This is how I include Kingdom Treasures. Werothegreat (talk) 23:00, 16 June 2013 (EDT)
- Agreed. Ajd (talk) 11:51, 5 November 2012 (EST)
