Talk:Vanilla
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --~~~~") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST) | Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | *I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --[[User:Drab Emordnilap|Drab Emordnilap]] ([[User talk:Drab Emordnilap|talk]]) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:26, 5 November 2012
Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --Qvist (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST)
- I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --Drab Emordnilap (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST)
