Talk:Vanilla
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST) | Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
*I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --[[User:Drab Emordnilap|Drab Emordnilap]] ([[User talk:Drab Emordnilap|talk]]) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | *I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --[[User:Drab Emordnilap|Drab Emordnilap]] ([[User talk:Drab Emordnilap|talk]]) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
+ | ::Agreed. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 11:51, 5 November 2012 (EST) |
Revision as of 12:51, 5 November 2012
Would anyone consider "discard X card(s)" as a vanilla effect? It feels pretty vanilla as it is the opposite of +X card(s). --Qvist (talk) 11:04, 5 November 2012 (EST)
- I think it'd be hard to draw the line at what is and isn't vanilla if we use any definition other than "plusses that are bolded". --Drab Emordnilap (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2012 (EST)