Editing Talk:Command variant

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in.

Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 2: Line 2:
 
*'''Commanders''' based on the command type. i don't love it though, because it implies the command type, which some of these do not have, which will be confusing for new players who may as well call them [[Way of the Mouse|Mice]]
 
*'''Commanders''' based on the command type. i don't love it though, because it implies the command type, which some of these do not have, which will be confusing for new players who may as well call them [[Way of the Mouse|Mice]]
 
*'''Pointers''' because they point to the card they play; name isn't going to be intuitive to anyone who isn't familiar with the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointer_(computer_programming) computer science term] but at this point neither is emulator.
 
*'''Pointers''' because they point to the card they play; name isn't going to be intuitive to anyone who isn't familiar with the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointer_(computer_programming) computer science term] but at this point neither is emulator.
*'''Cards that play other cards''' because uh they play other cards; don't love this because it is going to drastically increase the type of card to include stuff like {{Card|ghost}}, {{card|golem}}, {{card|vassal}}, {{Card|venture}}, etc
+
*'''Cards that play other cards''' because uh they play other cards; don't love this because it is going to drastically increase the type of card to include stuff like {{Card|ghost}}, {{card|golem}}, {{card|vassal}}, {{Car|venture}}, etc
 
--[[User:Spineflu|Spineflu]] ([[User talk:Spineflu|talk]]) 14:30, 7 March 2022 (EST)
 
--[[User:Spineflu|Spineflu]] ([[User talk:Spineflu|talk]]) 14:30, 7 March 2022 (EST)
 
:I agree that we should change the name, but I'm not a fan of any of those proposals. Maybe instead of having a general term for cards that do this, we should change the name of this page to '''Leaving it there''', after the (now-)shared rules mechanic rather than the set of cards. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 19:12, 7 March 2022 (EST)
 
 
:: I agree that "emulator" is an outdated term, and I like Ajd's proposal to rename these cards to reflect the rules of the game. [[User:Muenstercheese|Muenstercheese]] ([[User talk:Muenstercheese|talk]]) 20:42, 7 March 2022 (EST)
 
::
 
:: Can we try for something less um. tense-y, more name-y? Like, If I say, "I'll play a couple peddlers and a sifter", you all know what I'm talking about; If I say "I'll play a Leaving it there" it doesn't exactly flow or follow from the naming pattern on other cards. '''"Delegators"'''? --[[User:Spineflu|Spineflu]] ([[User talk:Spineflu|talk]]) 22:01, 7 March 2022 (EST)
 
 
::: Well, we could just say '''Band of Misfits variant''' or the like, like we do with [[Throne Room variant]] and [[Peddler variant]]. We'd have to actually decide what counts as a Misfits variant, though: Band of Misfits, Overlord, and Captain obviously are; Necromancer probably is. Way of the Mouse probably isn't. Is Inheritance or Prince?  I have no idea. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 02:23, 8 March 2022 (EST)
 
:
 
::::'''Director''' (like as a card that directs you to play a different card)? Like we all agree, BoM, Overlord, Captain, Necromancer, Inheritance, and Way of the Mouse are at minimum the cards we need to describe for this, right? So we should pick a name that at least describes those.--[[User:Spineflu|Spineflu]] ([[User talk:Spineflu|talk]]) 09:10, 8 March 2022 (EST)
 
:::::I'm opposed to inventing a new term out of whole cloth: that doesn't seem like the kind of thing the wiki should be doing, to me. Better for it to reflect actual usage among players. If I were trying to refer to this set of cards in writing, I think the most natural phrase I would reach for would be something like 'Command cards and those with similar mechanics' or possibly 'Command cards and their variants'. Is '''Command variants''' anything perhaps?? [[User:Saltroza|Saltroza]] ([[User talk:Saltroza|talk]]) 14:30, 16 March 2022 (EDT)
 
::::::Also not a fan of inventing new terms. I like Command variants as it doesn't try anything new and just expands the umbrella. --[[User:Terracubist|Terracubist]] ([[User talk:Terracubist|talk]]) 15:22, 16 March 2022 (EDT)
 
::::::I like command variants. let's do that. --[[User:Spineflu|Spineflu]] ([[User talk:Spineflu|talk]]) 15:32, 16 March 2022 (EDT)
 
::::::Seems okay to me. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 19:35, 16 March 2022 (EDT)
 

Please note that all contributions to DominionStrategy Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike (see DominionStrategy Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)

Templates used on this page:

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Views
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox