Editing Peddler variant
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
A {{Cost|4}} Peddler (are we clear on what I mean here, yes, okay) would probably be fine. I mean it would be good, but it would be acceptable power-level-wise. | A {{Cost|4}} Peddler (are we clear on what I mean here, yes, okay) would probably be fine. I mean it would be good, but it would be acceptable power-level-wise. | ||
− | The | + | The Vanilla card problem is, vanilla cards limit what other cards can do (in games where cards can't naturally just be blatantly different in power level). For example {{Card|Village}} at {{Cost|3}} means {{Card|Village}}-with-a-bonus has to cost {{Cost|4}}+. Otherwise some people are unhappy. It is really about that unhappiness, not necessarily any other issues. If say {{Card|Walled Village}} cost {{Cost|3}}, there would be people who were pissed. It would have no other negative consequences; it's still worth avoiding. |
So, again just in certain kinds of games, you want to ration out the vanilla cards. They're valuable for being very simple cards, but limit what other cards can do. | So, again just in certain kinds of games, you want to ration out the vanilla cards. They're valuable for being very simple cards, but limit what other cards can do. |