Editing Stronghold
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
== FAQ == | == FAQ == | ||
=== Official FAQ === | === Official FAQ === | ||
| − | + | === Other Rules clarifications === | |
| − | + | ||
== Strategy == | == Strategy == | ||
Stronghold plays surprisingly differently from other superficially-similar hybrid treasure cards such as {{Card|Nobles}} or {{Card|Harem}}, both of which also cost {{Cost|6}} and are worth {{VP|2}}, and not just because it is a [[fort]] and thus less straightforward or reliable to obtain. The choice given here tends to be more useful than the choice given by Nobles, where one of the choices (+2 Actions) is markedly weaker than the other. In this case, both choices are relatively strong, and the choice of taking a benefit now or delaying it until next turn tends to make this card even more beneficial than if either choice had to be taken on the same turn. Unlike Harem, however, this card requires a spare action to play. | Stronghold plays surprisingly differently from other superficially-similar hybrid treasure cards such as {{Card|Nobles}} or {{Card|Harem}}, both of which also cost {{Cost|6}} and are worth {{VP|2}}, and not just because it is a [[fort]] and thus less straightforward or reliable to obtain. The choice given here tends to be more useful than the choice given by Nobles, where one of the choices (+2 Actions) is markedly weaker than the other. In this case, both choices are relatively strong, and the choice of taking a benefit now or delaying it until next turn tends to make this card even more beneficial than if either choice had to be taken on the same turn. Unlike Harem, however, this card requires a spare action to play. | ||
