Editing Crew

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in.

Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 47: Line 47:
 
|Source=[https://discord.com/channels/212660788786102272/499250664690679808/1054476116125044799 Dominion Discord, 2022]
 
|Source=[https://discord.com/channels/212660788786102272/499250664690679808/1054476116125044799 Dominion Discord, 2022]
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 
=== Secret History ===
 
=== Secret History ===
{{Quote|Text=  
+
<!--{{Quote|Text=  
The initial idea was: "+2 Cards, set aside a card from your hand, next turn put it and this into your hand." That's just way stronger than it looks. And good times, we were all fans. Eventually testing established that it was too nuts. I tried letting you just take one of the cards next turn, but oops that sucks. Then I hit on putting it onto your deck next turn, which attacked the most problematic case, where you just buy Treasures and a Crew. The final version of Crew doesn't do that trick as well; every other turn you don't draw it.
+
 
  |Name=[[Donald X. Vaccarino]]
 
  |Name=[[Donald X. Vaccarino]]
  |Source=[http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=21589.msg899073#msg899073 The Secret History of Plunder]
+
  |Source=[http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic= The Secret History of Plunder]
 
}}
 
}}
=== Should this be in Allies? ===
+
-->
{{Quote|Text=
+
I might move a few cards from some sets to other ones in order to consolidate some themes; I haven't really given it much thought, but in general it makes sense. There was one {{Card|Tunnel}} because my philosophy at the time was to use each idea the minimum possible number of times. Then I had to make hundreds of cards and maybe there can be a 2nd card that triggers on discarding? And now there are a few and I mean if you put them all in one set it becomes part of the set identity, and they get more combos when playing with that set irl. There will always be spread-out related cards, and some things probably don't want to cluster, but overall I can see the beauty of it.
+
  
Crew and {{Card|Taskmaster}} specifically, well, they are pushing "variety of Duration effects" for Plunder. They are on-theme where they are. If one set had all the {{Card|Hireling}}s, well {{Set|Plunder}} still wanted one of those, and so on. Sure these two are also recursive, and thus fitting for {{Set|Allies}}; {{Set|Plunder}} specifically wanted them though. And {{Card|Taskmaster}} relates to next-time. I guess if I'd made both sets and they weren't out yet, I might consider moving Crew, but probably not {{Card|Taskmaster}}.
 
|Name=[[Donald X. Vaccarino]]
 
|Source=[http://forum.dominionstrategy.com/index.php?topic=5799.msg899072#msg899072 Interview with Donald X.]
 
}}
 
 
{{Navbox Plunder}}
 
{{Navbox Plunder}}
 
{{Navbox Cards}}
 
{{Navbox Cards}}

Please note that all contributions to DominionStrategy Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike (see DominionStrategy Wiki:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Views
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox