Editing Talk:Command variant
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
with the 2019 errata, can we consider changing the name of these? none of them emulate other cards anymore. My suggestions + rationale: | with the 2019 errata, can we consider changing the name of these? none of them emulate other cards anymore. My suggestions + rationale: | ||
− | *'''Commanders''' based on the command type. i don't love | + | *'''Commanders''' based on the command type. i don't love though, because it implies the command type, which some of these do not have |
*'''Pointers''' because they point to the card they play; name isn't going to be intuitive to anyone who isn't familiar with the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointer_(computer_programming) computer science term] but at this point neither is emulator. | *'''Pointers''' because they point to the card they play; name isn't going to be intuitive to anyone who isn't familiar with the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointer_(computer_programming) computer science term] but at this point neither is emulator. | ||
*'''Cards that play other cards''' because uh they play other cards; don't love this because it is going to drastically increase the type of card to include stuff like {{Card|ghost}}, {{card|golem}}, {{card|vassal}}, {{Card|venture}}, etc | *'''Cards that play other cards''' because uh they play other cards; don't love this because it is going to drastically increase the type of card to include stuff like {{Card|ghost}}, {{card|golem}}, {{card|vassal}}, {{Card|venture}}, etc |