Editing Talk:Dominion
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I like "Dominion" better. It's the name on the box, which doesn't say "Base" anywhere. We could call the game as a whole "Dominion (game)". Or, I guess we could call the base set "Dominion (base game)". But, I think it's best to have "Dominion" in the name, since that's what it is. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:43, 26 October 2012 (EDT) | :I like "Dominion" better. It's the name on the box, which doesn't say "Base" anywhere. We could call the game as a whole "Dominion (game)". Or, I guess we could call the base set "Dominion (base game)". But, I think it's best to have "Dominion" in the name, since that's what it is. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:43, 26 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
::I'm still not convinced. Hinterlands isn't called Hinterlands; it's called "Dominion: Hinterlands". So Dominion is redundant in all sets and should be the name of the series. The base game should be marked as such. Any other opinions on that matter?? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 10:09, 27 October 2012 (EDT) | ::I'm still not convinced. Hinterlands isn't called Hinterlands; it's called "Dominion: Hinterlands". So Dominion is redundant in all sets and should be the name of the series. The base game should be marked as such. Any other opinions on that matter?? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 10:09, 27 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
− | |||
== general expansion formatting == | == general expansion formatting == |