Editing Talk:Dominion

Should we name the First Set "Base" or "Dominion"? Maybe we should name the Series "Dominion" and the first set "Base"? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 09:32, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
:I like "Dominion" better. It's the name on the box, which doesn't say "Base" anywhere. We could call the game as a whole "Dominion (game)". Or, I guess we could call the base set "Dominion (base game)". But, I think it's best to have "Dominion" in the name, since that's what it is. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:43, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
::I'm still not convinced. Hinterlands isn't called Hinterlands; it's called "Dominion: Hinterlands". So Dominion is redundant in all sets and should be the name of the series. The base game should be marked as such. Any other opinions on that matter?? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 10:09, 27 October 2012 (EDT)
:::I can see this point, but still like Dominion better. But, I'm fine either way. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 10:12, 27 October 2012 (EDT)

== general expansion formatting ==

We need to have some sort of template for the expansion pages. I figure we have a short introduction, and then a separate section for the flavor text, like I've done here. We should also include the official rule pdf somewhere but I'm not sure where best to put it. --[[User:Jonts|Jonts]] ([[User talk:Jonts|talk]]) 11:18, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
:I like how you've set it up so far. I'd suggest linking the PDF in some sort of "External Links" or "Other Resources" section at the end of the article. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 11:22, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
I considered that, but I feel like we might just have only the one link. And it seems strange to have a section for one link. --[[User:Jonts|Jonts]] ([[User talk:Jonts|talk]]) 11:45, 26 October 2012 (EDT)<br/>
Had another idea. What if we put the link to the official rules in the sidebox?--[[User:Jonts|Jonts]] ([[User talk:Jonts|talk]]) 12:18, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
:Sounds good here. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 12:22, 26 October 2012 (EDT)

== details to include ==

So I figure we are using base set as a template for the other sets. So I'd like to make sure we have this as fleshed out as we can before we start moving on. Are there any other major points which should be added somewhere on this page?--[[User:Jonts|Jonts]] ([[User talk:Jonts|talk]]) 15:49, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 So I figure we are using base set as a template for the other sets. So I'd like to make sure we have this as fleshed out as we can before we start moving on. Are there any other major points which should be added somewhere on this page?--[[User:Jonts|Jonts]] ([[User talk:Jonts|talk]]) 15:49, 26 October 2012 (EDT)
-== Game vs. First set ==
-I think I remember this being mentioned elsewhere, but would it be beneficial to have two seperate pages, one for the actual game of Dominion and one for just the base set? --[[User:Jonts|Jonts]] ([[User talk:Jonts|talk]]) 03:14, 10 November 2012 (EST)
-:It would! [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 11:02, 10 November 2012 (EST)
-::Ok, so I changed it so this page is the actual game, and the page Dominion (Base Set) is the page for the set. I copied over everything that was here to that page and left this page a stub. Now I just need to go find all references to the set and change over the link. I might miss some, so keep an eye out for any that go to the wrong place. --[[User:Jonts|Jonts]] ([[User talk:Jonts|talk]]) 14:10, 10 November 2012 (EST)