Talk:Luck-based
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Created page with "I don't really think this is a well-thought-out article. There can be an article on the role of luck in Dominion, and there can be an article on each of these card mechanics, ...") |
Werothegreat (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't really think this is a well-thought-out article. There can be an article on the role of luck in Dominion, and there can be an article on each of these card mechanics, but I don't think these three mechanics really form a natural class of "luck-based cards". [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 00:45, 14 December 2013 (EST) | I don't really think this is a well-thought-out article. There can be an article on the role of luck in Dominion, and there can be an article on each of these card mechanics, but I don't think these three mechanics really form a natural class of "luck-based cards". [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 00:45, 14 December 2013 (EST) | ||
| + | *On consideration, I agree with you. I made this article because I initially thought there weren't enough Naming cards to support an article on their own. [[User:Werothegreat|Werothegreat]] ([[User talk:Werothegreat|talk]]) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:12, 14 December 2013
I don't really think this is a well-thought-out article. There can be an article on the role of luck in Dominion, and there can be an article on each of these card mechanics, but I don't think these three mechanics really form a natural class of "luck-based cards". Ajd (talk) 00:45, 14 December 2013 (EST)
- On consideration, I agree with you. I made this article because I initially thought there weren't enough Naming cards to support an article on their own. Werothegreat (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2013 (EST)
