Talk:Command variant
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I agree that we should change the name, but I'm not a fan of any of those proposals. Maybe instead of having a general term for cards that do this, we should change the name of this page to '''Leaving it there''', after the (now-)shared rules mechanic rather than the set of cards. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 19:12, 7 March 2022 (EST) | :I agree that we should change the name, but I'm not a fan of any of those proposals. Maybe instead of having a general term for cards that do this, we should change the name of this page to '''Leaving it there''', after the (now-)shared rules mechanic rather than the set of cards. [[User:Ajd|Ajd]] ([[User talk:Ajd|talk]]) 19:12, 7 March 2022 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: I agree that "emulator" is an outdated term, and I like Ajd's proposal to rename these cards to reflect the rules of the game. [[User:Muenstercheese|Muenstercheese]] ([[User talk:Muenstercheese|talk]]) 20:42, 7 March 2022 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 21:42, 7 March 2022
with the 2019 errata, can we consider changing the name of these? none of them emulate other cards anymore. My suggestions + rationale:
- Commanders based on the command type. i don't love it though, because it implies the command type, which some of these do not have, which will be confusing for new players who may as well call them Mice
- Pointers because they point to the card they play; name isn't going to be intuitive to anyone who isn't familiar with the computer science term but at this point neither is emulator.
- Cards that play other cards because uh they play other cards; don't love this because it is going to drastically increase the type of card to include stuff like ghost, golem, vassal, venture, etc
--Spineflu (talk) 14:30, 7 March 2022 (EST)
- I agree that we should change the name, but I'm not a fan of any of those proposals. Maybe instead of having a general term for cards that do this, we should change the name of this page to Leaving it there, after the (now-)shared rules mechanic rather than the set of cards. Ajd (talk) 19:12, 7 March 2022 (EST)
- I agree that "emulator" is an outdated term, and I like Ajd's proposal to rename these cards to reflect the rules of the game. Muenstercheese (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2022 (EST)
