Editing Talk:Main Page
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:How about moving the ToDos to [[DominionStrategy_Wiki:Community_portal]]? My thought about the Main Page is to provide links as entry points to all categories. I will add several categories later. --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 09:15, 31 October 2012 (EDT) | :How about moving the ToDos to [[DominionStrategy_Wiki:Community_portal]]? My thought about the Main Page is to provide links as entry points to all categories. I will add several categories later. --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 09:15, 31 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
::Done. Should we keep the "Featured Links" box around? I feel like those can be linked from their respective pages within the wiki. Under the box at the top of the page, I'd love to have a "important pages" box and a "featured article" box. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:36, 31 October 2012 (EDT) | ::Done. Should we keep the "Featured Links" box around? I feel like those can be linked from their respective pages within the wiki. Under the box at the top of the page, I'd love to have a "important pages" box and a "featured article" box. --[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 09:36, 31 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=== Card back image === | === Card back image === | ||
Line 32: | Line 29: | ||
=== Citations === | === Citations === | ||
− | How should we handle citations? I tried | + | How should we handle citations? I tried <ref> ... </ref> like on Wikipedia, and it didn't work.--[[User:Schneau|Schneau]] ([[User talk:Schneau|talk]]) 07:32, 31 October 2012 (EDT) |
::It seems that I have to enable that specificly. I look at that later --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 09:15, 31 October 2012 (EDT) | ::It seems that I have to enable that specificly. I look at that later --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 09:15, 31 October 2012 (EDT) | ||
::: I just installed the Cite extension. If you add <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> and add at the end of the article <nowiki><references /></nowiki> you have the desired outcome. | ::: I just installed the Cite extension. If you add <nowiki><ref></ref></nowiki> and add at the end of the article <nowiki><references /></nowiki> you have the desired outcome. | ||
Line 47: | Line 44: | ||
It would be great to have small, text-sized coin symbols that could be used in-line with text. So, instead of putting +$4, you could put <nowiki>{{Coin4}}</nowiki>, and it would print the Dominion coin symbol with a 4 in it. These would be useful in a lot of places, and would look really nice. We could also have one without a number in it (that could be used in place of +Coins or +$ (like on [[Salvager]]), and one with a Potion symbol for Potion costs. I think I could make the templates if I had the coin images - if anyone has access to them and could upload them, that would be great! | It would be great to have small, text-sized coin symbols that could be used in-line with text. So, instead of putting +$4, you could put <nowiki>{{Coin4}}</nowiki>, and it would print the Dominion coin symbol with a 4 in it. These would be useful in a lot of places, and would look really nice. We could also have one without a number in it (that could be used in place of +Coins or +$ (like on [[Salvager]]), and one with a Potion symbol for Potion costs. I think I could make the templates if I had the coin images - if anyone has access to them and could upload them, that would be great! | ||
:Use <nowiki>{{Coin|4}}</nowiki> for Coin symbols now. The will eventually be changed. And Potion is also still missing. --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 19:14, 5 November 2012 (EST) | :Use <nowiki>{{Coin|4}}</nowiki> for Coin symbols now. The will eventually be changed. And Potion is also still missing. --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 19:14, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
− | |||
=== [[Opening]] === | === [[Opening]] === | ||
Line 55: | Line 51: | ||
We need to somehow add flexibility to [[Template:Cardbox]] because for cards with two different designs (almost all the Basic cards), there are two different illustrators. Either we have to un-link the illustrators and put the double brackets in manually (in order to have "[[Artist Name]] (top), [[Another Name]] (bottom)"), or we need a separate "Illustrator2" field (which would look weird), or we need to make a separate, slightly different template altogether. Thoughts? -[[User:Thirtyseven|Thirtyseven]] ([[User talk:Thirtyseven|talk]]) 15:16, 5 November 2012 (EST) | We need to somehow add flexibility to [[Template:Cardbox]] because for cards with two different designs (almost all the Basic cards), there are two different illustrators. Either we have to un-link the illustrators and put the double brackets in manually (in order to have "[[Artist Name]] (top), [[Another Name]] (bottom)"), or we need a separate "Illustrator2" field (which would look weird), or we need to make a separate, slightly different template altogether. Thoughts? -[[User:Thirtyseven|Thirtyseven]] ([[User talk:Thirtyseven|talk]]) 15:16, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
:Do you know the Illustrators of the original art? They aren't mentioned are they? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 19:14, 5 November 2012 (EST) | :Do you know the Illustrators of the original art? They aren't mentioned are they? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 19:14, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
Also, would you support or oppose adding "Qvist ranking" to the template in order for the reader to quickly gauge how relatively strong or weak the card is? -[[User:Thirtyseven|Thirtyseven]] ([[User talk:Thirtyseven|talk]]) 16:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | Also, would you support or oppose adding "Qvist ranking" to the template in order for the reader to quickly gauge how relatively strong or weak the card is? -[[User:Thirtyseven|Thirtyseven]] ([[User talk:Thirtyseven|talk]]) 16:26, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
:This isn't high priority IMHO and I'm still not sure if it should go there. Maybe let's wait until the next ranking so that Dark Ages are included!? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 19:14, 5 November 2012 (EST) | :This isn't high priority IMHO and I'm still not sure if it should go there. Maybe let's wait until the next ranking so that Dark Ages are included!? --[[User:Qvist|Qvist]] ([[User talk:Qvist|talk]]) 19:14, 5 November 2012 (EST) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |