Combo: Trader and Feodum: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→top: improve tag combo pages |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Improve}} | |||
{{Infobox 2CardCombo | {{Infobox 2CardCombo | ||
|name1 = Trader | |name1 = Trader | ||
Line 13: | Line 15: | ||
In general, Trader is a fairly mediocre card. Getting a pile of Silvers is nice, but usually not at the cost of a single expensive card. But with Feodum, you'd much rather have the Silvers. In most kingdoms that feature these 2 cards, the play will be something like the following: | In general, Trader is a fairly mediocre card. Getting a pile of Silvers is nice, but usually not at the cost of a single expensive card. But with Feodum, you'd much rather have the Silvers. In most kingdoms that feature these 2 cards, the play will be something like the following: | ||
==Purchases (in order)== | == Purchases (in order) == | ||
*Buy one Trader | * Buy one Trader | ||
*Buy as many Feoda as possible (get Silver if you only have {{Cost|3}}, pass on {{Cost|2}} or less) | * Buy as many Feoda as possible (get Silver if you only have {{Cost|3}}, pass on {{Cost|2}} or less) | ||
When Feodum pile is empty... | When Feodum pile is empty... | ||
*{{Cost|8}}+ = buy Province | * {{Cost|8}}+ = buy Province | ||
*{{Cost|4}} - {{Cost|7}} = buy Trader (or Duchy if the game will end before you get another reshuffle) | * {{Cost|4}} - {{Cost|7}} = buy Trader (or Duchy if the game will end before you get another reshuffle) | ||
*Less than {{Cost|4}} = Silver or Estate | * Less than {{Cost|4}} = Silver or Estate | ||
==Using Trader== | == Using Trader == | ||
Use Trader on the following (in order of best trade to least): | Use Trader on the following (in order of best trade to least): | ||
*Province (see math below) | * Province (see math below) | ||
*Feodum (see math below - in a few cases, you wouldn't, but usually, yes... especially early in the game) | * Feodum (see math below - in a few cases, you wouldn't, but usually, yes... especially early in the game) | ||
*Estate | * Estate | ||
*Trader | * Trader | ||
*Silver | * Silver | ||
*Copper | * Copper | ||
==Synergies== | == Synergies == | ||
*{{Card|Rats}} quickly turns your Coppers and Estates into {{Cost|4}} cards that can be turned into four Silvers each, as well as drawing you a card. This is the only instance where Rats does well with Trader. | * {{Card|Rats}} quickly turns your Coppers and Estates into {{Cost|4}} cards that can be turned into four Silvers each, as well as drawing you a card. This is the only instance where Rats does well with Trader. | ||
*{{Card|Fortress}} can also be useful, as it can be trashed over and over again into Silvers, as well as letting you play more than one Trader per turn. | * {{Card|Fortress}} can also be useful, as it can be trashed over and over again into Silvers, as well as letting you play more than one Trader per turn. | ||
Line 53: | Line 55: | ||
[[File:TraderOnProvince.jpg|alt=TraderOnProvince|Red values show when it isn't worth it (VP-wise) to trade in your Province.]] | [[File:TraderOnProvince.jpg|alt=TraderOnProvince|Red values show when it isn't worth it (VP-wise) to trade in your Province.]] | ||
*If you have 3 or more Feoda in your deck, '''DO IT'''. Adding 8 silvers will always give you at least 6 VPs, and therefore is worth it. | * If you have 3 or more Feoda in your deck, '''DO IT'''. Adding 8 silvers will always give you at least 6 VPs, and therefore is worth it. | ||
*If you have only 1 Feodum, '''DON'T DO IT'''. Trading a Province will leave you with only 2-3 VPs, a net of -3 or -4. | * If you have only 1 Feodum, '''DON'T DO IT'''. Trading a Province will leave you with only 2-3 VPs, a net of -3 or -4. | ||
*The situation-dependent case is 2 Feoda. 2/3 the time you will receive 6 VPs (net = 0 VPs) and 1/3 of the time 4 VPs (net = -2 VPs). Thus, on the last turn of the game, don't do it. But if you have a reshuffle left, you probably want the buying power of 8 Silvers. | * The situation-dependent case is 2 Feoda. 2/3 the time you will receive 6 VPs (net = 0 VPs) and 1/3 of the time 4 VPs (net = -2 VPs). Thus, on the last turn of the game, don't do it. But if you have a reshuffle left, you probably want the buying power of 8 Silvers. | ||
== Math: Trader on Colony == | == Math: Trader on Colony == | ||
Line 62: | Line 64: | ||
[[File:TraderOnColony.jpg|alt=TraderOnColony|Red values show when it isn't worth it (VP-wise) to trade in your Colony.]] | [[File:TraderOnColony.jpg|alt=TraderOnColony|Red values show when it isn't worth it (VP-wise) to trade in your Colony.]] | ||
*4 or more Feoda: '''DO IT''' | * 4 or more Feoda: '''DO IT''' | ||
*1 or 2 Feoda: '''DON'T DO IT''' | * 1 or 2 Feoda: '''DON'T DO IT''' | ||
*3 Feoda: 2/3 of the time you gain 12 (net +2 VPs), 1/3 of the time you gain 9 (net -1 VPs) | * 3 Feoda: 2/3 of the time you gain 12 (net +2 VPs), 1/3 of the time you gain 9 (net -1 VPs) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:35, 21 April 2021
This page is awaiting large-scale edits by the community to meet quality and format standards. The information on this page may be outdated. Join the #wiki-general channel on the Dominion Discord server to participate. |
Trader / Feodum | |||
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Info | |||
Set(s) | Hinterlands / Dark Ages | ||
Type | Rush |
Trader and Feodum is a combo that uses Trader's Silver-gaining to beef up the points you get from Feodum.
In general, Trader is a fairly mediocre card. Getting a pile of Silvers is nice, but usually not at the cost of a single expensive card. But with Feodum, you'd much rather have the Silvers. In most kingdoms that feature these 2 cards, the play will be something like the following:
Purchases (in order)
- Buy one Trader
- Buy as many Feoda as possible (get Silver if you only have , pass on or less)
When Feodum pile is empty...
- + = buy Province
- - = buy Trader (or Duchy if the game will end before you get another reshuffle)
- Less than = Silver or Estate
Using Trader
Use Trader on the following (in order of best trade to least):
- Province (see math below)
- Feodum (see math below - in a few cases, you wouldn't, but usually, yes... especially early in the game)
- Estate
- Trader
- Silver
- Copper
Synergies
- Rats quickly turns your Coppers and Estates into cards that can be turned into four Silvers each, as well as drawing you a card. This is the only instance where Rats does well with Trader.
- Fortress can also be useful, as it can be trashed over and over again into Silvers, as well as letting you play more than one Trader per turn.
Math: Trader on Feodum
When do you want trade a Feodum for 7 Silvers? The mathematical answer is... often!
The formula for the calculation is:
And here is a cross-table of that formula. The left side shows how many Feoda are in your deck, the top is how many Silvers. Red values show when it isn't worth it (VP-wise) to trade in your Feodum.
Bear in mind that this chart only takes into account the VP differential. If there is still a reshuffle or two left before the end of the game, the 7 silvers also provide buying potential. An immediate -1 or -2 VPs could be compensated with a higher probability of making a Province purchase in your reshuffle.
Math: Trader on Province
The math for understanding when to use Trader on a Province is much simpler:
- If you have 3 or more Feoda in your deck, DO IT. Adding 8 silvers will always give you at least 6 VPs, and therefore is worth it.
- If you have only 1 Feodum, DON'T DO IT. Trading a Province will leave you with only 2-3 VPs, a net of -3 or -4.
- The situation-dependent case is 2 Feoda. 2/3 the time you will receive 6 VPs (net = 0 VPs) and 1/3 of the time 4 VPs (net = -2 VPs). Thus, on the last turn of the game, don't do it. But if you have a reshuffle left, you probably want the buying power of 8 Silvers.
Math: Trader on Colony
How did you get Colonies in your deck playing Trader/Feodum? Huh, well, here's the math:
- 4 or more Feoda: DO IT
- 1 or 2 Feoda: DON'T DO IT
- 3 Feoda: 2/3 of the time you gain 12 (net +2 VPs), 1/3 of the time you gain 9 (net -1 VPs)