Capitalism
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Strategy) |
(→Synergies and Combos) |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
===Synergies and Combos=== | ===Synergies and Combos=== | ||
*{{card|Vassal}} | *{{card|Vassal}} | ||
+ | *{{card|Mine}} | ||
+ | *{{card|Poor House}} (when played as the last card in the Buy phase) | ||
== Versions == | == Versions == |
Revision as of 19:52, 8 September 2019
Capitalism | |
---|---|
Info | |
Cost | |
Type | Project |
Set | Renaissance |
Illustrator(s) | Martin Hoffmann |
Project text | |
During your turns, Actions with + amounts in their text are also Treasures. |
Capitalism is a Project from Renaissance. Once you've claimed this ability, on your turns Action cards that produce acquire the Treasure type. This allows these Action cards to be played non-terminally during your Buy phase and to interact with cards that care about Treasures, such as Mine and Pirate Ship.
Contents |
FAQ
Official FAQ
- To be affected, a card must have a + amount in its text, not just a amount - for example, Capitalism turns Improve into a Treasure, but does not affect Inventor.
- Having Capitalism means you can play any number of Action cards with + amounts in your Buy phase (without using up Action plays).
- It also means that things that interact with Treasure cards also interact with those cards; for example, if you have Capitalism, you can use Treasurer to gain an Improve from the trash, since Improve is a Treasure on your turns.
- Any time you play an Action - Treasure card, it is both an Action and a Treasure, regardless of which phase it is.
- Getting +1 Action in your Buy phase does not let you play other Action cards then.
- Capitalism works on your turn, but affects cards everywhere; for example if you have Capitalism and play Bandit, you could trash another player's Improve, and it is not relevant if that player has Capitalism or not.
Cards that Capitalism affects
Cards in italics have been removed.
- Abandoned Mine
- Poor House
- Duchess, Embargo, Herbalist, Lighthouse, Pawn, Peasant, Secret Chamber, Squire, Tracker
- Amulet, Black Market, Caravan Guard, Cargo Ship, Catapult, Chancellor, Chariot Race, Farmers' Market, Fishing Village, Forager, Fortune Teller, Gladiator, Improve, Merchant, Oasis, Secret Cave, Steward, Storeroom, Swindler, Trade Route, Vassal, Woodcutter
- Bard, Baron, Bishop, Bridge, Conclave, Conspirator, Cutpurse, Death Cart, Flag Bearer, Horse Traders, Ironmonger, Ironworks, Messenger, Militia, Mill, Mining Village, Miser, Moneylender, Monument, Navigator, Noble Brigand, Nomad Camp, Patron, Pirate Ship, Poacher, Priest, Sacrifice, Salvager, Scavenger, Spice Merchant, Tournament, Villa
- Artificer, Bazaar, City, Count, Courtier, Dame Sylvia, Emporium, Festival, Giant, Haggler, Harvest, Jester, Junk Dealer, Legionary, Mandarin, Market, Merchant Guild, Merchant Ship, Minion, Mountebank, Mystic, Rogue, Sacred Grove, Storyteller, Swamp Hag, Tormentor, Treasurer, Treasury, Tribute, Vault, Wine Merchant
- Goons, Grand Market
- Opulent Castle
- Peddler
- Other: Mercenary, Trusty Steed, Soldier, Treasure Hunter, Hero, Teacher
Strategy
Synergies and Combos
- Vassal
- Mine
- Poor House (when played as the last card in the Buy phase)
Versions
English versions
Digital | Text | Release | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
During your turns, Actions with + amounts in their text are also Treasures. | Renaissance | November 2018 |
Other language versions
Language | Name | Digital | Text | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese | 資本主義 (pron. zīběnzhǔyì) | |||
French | Capitalisme | Pendant vos tours, les cartes Action ayant dans leur texte un montant « + » sont aussi des Trésors. | ||
German | Kapitalismus | |||
Japanese | 資本主義 (pron. shihonshugi) | あなたのターン中、指示文に「+」と書いてあるアクションカードは、財宝カードでもある。 | ||
Russian | Капитализм (pron. kapitalizm) |
Trivia
Capitalism and Patron are the only card-shaped things to care about the text on cards.
Secret History
There was a thing that made your Silvers be Peddlers in your Action phase, then a thing that tried making your Treasures into Actions. It just isn't useful often enough. Once I hit on this, it was a question, should it be "+ amounts" or specific ones, e.g. "+ or +." We tried it both ways.