Expand
Expand | |
---|---|
Info | |
Cost | |
Type(s) | Action |
Kingdom card? | Yes |
Set | Prosperity |
Illustrator(s) | Ryan Laukat |
Card text | |
Trash a card from your hand. Gain a card costing up to | more than it.
Expand is an Action card from Prosperity. It is a stronger but more expensive version of Remodel, allowing you to trash a card and gain a card costing more.
FAQ
Official FAQ
- If you do not have a card to trash, you do not gain one.
- If you do gain a card, it comes from the Supply and is put into your discard pile.
- The gained card does not need to cost exactly more than the trashed card; it can cost that much or less, and can even be another copy of the trashed card.
Other Rules clarifications
- Familiar into a Possession. is counted as part of the cost, so you could Expand a
Strategy
Expand is an expensive Remodel variant that is held back by its large opportunity cost and the fact that it is not commensurately stronger than the Remodel. Expand suffers from some of the same problems, namely that as a terminal stop card it wants engine-levels of draw and village support to be played reliably and collide with its intended targets, and that without a gainer supplying expensive fodder such as Golds the cards you can Expand into are limited. Furthermore, Expand’s high cost means that you are unlikely to be able to afford it until the midgame, and so unlike Remodel (which can be bought in the opening) it is usually slow to improve your early deck by trashing your starting junk. If the options for both thinning and additional gains are limited, or it is relatively easy to acquire (e.g., with Transport or Lurker), Expand can still be useful, even if only as an expensive Remodel.
The main advantage Expand has over Remodel is that it can gain slightly more expensive cards. However, the difference between more than the trashed card and more is often not enough to justify Expand’s cost. The most common options for Expand fodder are Coppers and Estates since you start with them. In the case of the latter, Expand can be very appealing, as cards are generally much stronger than cards, and you’re simultaneously removing one of the worst cards in your starting deck. Given the option, however, it is usually faster to simply trash your Estates by other means (e.g. Chapel) and acquire the cards by buying them, rather than detouring for Expand. On the other hand, if the other thinning options are restricted (e.g. Moneylender), Expand is likely a good way to deal with your Estates as well as the Moneylender once it is no longer useful. Similar logic applies to the case of the former, and additionally your options at the price point are usually not that much better from those at the pricepoint (e.g., a Silver rather than a Supplies). Additionally, many of the typical functions a Remodel variant serves—upgrading Golds into Province, or milling Provinces—are not significantly better with Expand. Expand’s ability to additionally convert cards into Provinces is notable for increasing your scoring potential in the endgame, but gainers that can provide fodder at this price point are much less common than Gold gainers.
Expand works well with the typical prime targets for trash-for-benefit effects, most notably Peddler (which can be acquired for much less than ) and Fortress (which provides infinite fodder). Additionally, with a price of , it can itself be a relevant target for chains of sequentially increasing costs, such as with Upgrade or Develop.
External strategy articles
Note: Article(s) below are by individual authors and may not represent the community's current views on cards, but may provide more in-depth information or give historical perspective. Caveat emptor.
Versions
English versions
Digital | Text | Release | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trash a card from your hand. Gain a card costing up to | more than the trashed card.Prosperity | October 2010 | ||
Trash a card from your hand. Gain a card costing up to | more than it.Prosperity (2016 printing) | February 2017 |
Other language versions
Language | Name | Digital | Text | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese | 擴建 | 移除一張手牌,獲得一張比該卡價值至多多 | 的卡片。|||
Czech | Růst | ||||
Dutch | Uitbreiden | Vernietig een kaart uit je hand. Pak een kaart die ten hoogste | meer kost dan de vernietigde kaart.|||
Finnish | Laajennus | ||||
French | Agrandissement | ||||
German | Ausbau | Entsorge eine Karte aus deiner Hand. Nimm dir eine Karte, die bis zu | mehr kostet als die entsorgte Karte.(2010) one or more other versions listed here | ||
German | Ausbau | Entsorge eine deiner Handkarten. Nimm eine Karte, die bis zu | mehr als jene kostet.(Nachdruck 2021) | ||
Italian | Ampliamento | ||||
Japanese | 拡張 (pron. kakuchō) |
手札1枚を廃棄する。それよりコストが最大 | 高いカード1枚を獲得する。|||
Polish | Modernizacja | Wyzruć na śmietnisko kartę z ręki. Dodaj kartę o koszcie większym o maksymalnie | od kosztu wyrzuconej karty.|||
Russian | Расширение (pron. rasshiryeniye) | ||||
Spanish | Expansión |
Trivia
Preview
Secret History
Why does it cost 7?
At the time I wasn't focused on adding lots of tiny text to cards to hit the perfect value for experienced players while making them awful for normal players; I was making cards and then seeing what to charge for them. For normal players, I think Expand is great as is; it does something they want to do and they buy it and do it. Meanwhile experienced players get to decide when it's worth getting and when it isn't; it's not just worthless.
It makes no sense to compare it to Scout. Scout's effect is weak; Expand's is strong. You don't even need to consider opportunity cost for Scout; odds are you don't want it. When we set up a board in favor of Scout, then opportunity cost becomes the issue. But I always want Expand; there's no issue but opportunity cost. If I started the game with Upgrade and Expand in my deck, I would Upgrade Coppers and Expand Estates; it would be a while before I was ready to let go of either one.