Swamp Shacks
From DominionStrategy Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (Rule book uses Fortune Hunter not Storyteller as the example of an Action that puts Treasures into play) |
(→Other language versions) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|- | |- | ||
!German | !German | ||
− | | Sumpfhütten || {{CardLangVersionImage|German}} || {{CardLangVersionImage|German|d=1}} || style="padding:0px 15px;"| '''+2 Aktionen<br>+1 Karte''' pro 3 Karten, die du | + | | Sumpfhütten || {{CardLangVersionImage|German}} || {{CardLangVersionImage|German|d=1}} || style="padding:0px 15px;"| '''+2 Aktionen<br>+1 Karte''' pro 3 Karten, die du im Spiel hast (abgerundet). || |
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 16:56, 3 April 2023
Swamp Shacks | |
---|---|
Info | |
Cost | |
Type(s) | Action |
Kingdom card? | Yes |
Set | Plunder |
Illustrator(s) | Jessi J |
Card text | |
+2 Actions +1 Card per 3 cards you have in play (round down). |
Swamp Shacks is an Action card from Plunder. It is a village that provides a variable number of +Cards, increasing the more cards you already have in play when you play it.
Contents |
FAQ
Official FAQ
- This counts the Swamp Shacks itself, and Duration cards played on previous turns that are still in play.
- It counts Treasures if you have some in play, such as Treasure Duration cards, or due to Fortune Hunter.
- It does not count set aside cards, such as cards on a Quartermaster.
- Round down the number of cards you draw; if you have 8 cards in play, you draw 2.
Other rules clarifications
Strategy
Versions
English versions
Digital | Text | Release | Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|
+2 Actions +1 Card per 3 cards you have in play (round down). |
Plunder | December 2022 |
Other language versions
Language | Name | Digital | Text | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
German | Sumpfhütten | +2 Aktionen +1 Karte pro 3 Karten, die du im Spiel hast (abgerundet). |
Trivia
Preview
Swamp Shacks is a non-Duration card that cares about Duration cards. It doesn't call them out but you can see how they help it.
Secret History
Initially cost and gave +1 Card per 4 cards you had in play. Mostly it was the final version, but at . It got a lot of extra testing. It's insane, how could this card exist, but initially it's bad and that makes all the difference.