Ironmonger
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-(\{\{Infobox Card[^\}]*)(\n[^\n]*set =[^\n]*) +\1)) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ||
{{Infobox Card | {{Infobox Card | ||
|name = Ironmonger | |name = Ironmonger | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|text = +1 Card<br />+1 Action<br />Reveal the top card of your deck; you may discard it.<br />Either way, if it is an...<br />Action card, +1 Action<br />Treasure card, +{{Cost|1}}<br />Victory card, +1 Card. | |text = +1 Card<br />+1 Action<br />Reveal the top card of your deck; you may discard it.<br />Either way, if it is an...<br />Action card, +1 Action<br />Treasure card, +{{Cost|1}}<br />Victory card, +1 Card. | ||
}} | }} | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Ironmonger''' is an [[Action]] card from [[Dark Ages]]. It is always a [[cantrip]], but it lets you reveal the top card of your deck and get an [[Ironworks]]-like bonus depending on what card you revealed. Ironmonger can be a [[Villages|Village]], a [[Laboratory]], or a [[Peddler]] depending on what it finds. | ||
== FAQ == | == FAQ == | ||
Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
* First you draw a card, then you reveal the top card of your deck, then you either discard that card or put it back on top of your deck. | * First you draw a card, then you reveal the top card of your deck, then you either discard that card or put it back on top of your deck. | ||
* Then you get bonuses based on the types of the card you revealed. | * Then you get bonuses based on the types of the card you revealed. | ||
− | * A card with 2 types gives you both bonuses; for example, if you revealed Harem (from Intrigue), you would both draw a card and get +{{Cost|1}}. | + | * A card with 2 types gives you both bonuses; for example, if you revealed [[Harem]] (from [[Intrigue]]), you would both draw a card and get +{{Cost|1}}. |
=== Other Rules clarifications === | === Other Rules clarifications === | ||
Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
''[http://dominionstrategy.com/2012/10/15/dark-ages-ironmonger/ Original article] incorporating analysis from mischiefmaker and DrFlux.'' | ''[http://dominionstrategy.com/2012/10/15/dark-ages-ironmonger/ Original article] incorporating analysis from mischiefmaker and DrFlux.'' | ||
− | By itself, Ironmonger is surprisingly strong. Solo play suggests that straight Ironmonger-Money is about equivalent to Smithy-Money: 14-17 turns to get to 4 Provinces and some Duchies. | + | By itself, Ironmonger is surprisingly strong. Solo play suggests that straight Ironmonger-Money is about equivalent to [[Smithy]]-[[Big Money]]: 14-17 turns to get to 4 Provinces and some Duchies. |
In a more diverse deck, Ironmonger is sort of like three different cards, depending on what it hits: | In a more diverse deck, Ironmonger is sort of like three different cards, depending on what it hits: | ||
− | Treasure: +1 Card, +1 Action, +{{Cost|1}}, could discard Copper. This card is like a | + | [[Treasure]]: +1 Card, +1 Action, +{{Cost|1}}, could discard [[Copper]]. This card is like a [[Laboratory]] in a way: you are drawing the Copper and discarding it, but you still get the +{{Cost|1}}. If you aren’t drawing Copper, then it’s about equivalent to Peddler, but with some info about your next card. On its own it’d probably cost about {{Cost|4}}-{{Cost|5}}. |
− | Victory: +2 Cards, +1 Action, can discard a Victory card. This is strictly better than a Laboratory, since it’s sort of like +3 Cards / +1 Action with the discard. So on its own it’d cost at least {{Cost|5}}. | + | [[Victory]]: +2 Cards, +1 Action, can discard a Victory card. This is strictly better than a Laboratory, since it’s sort of like +3 Cards / +1 Action with the discard. So on its own it’d cost at least {{Cost|5}}. |
− | Action: +1 Card, +2 Actions, could but probably won’t discard an Action. This is a Village, and probably not enough bonus on top of the Village to differentiate it from a typical vanilla {{Cost|3}} Village. | + | [[Action]]: +1 Card, +2 Actions, could but probably won’t discard an Action. This is a [[Village (Card type)|Village]], and probably not enough bonus on top of the Village to differentiate it from a typical [[vanilla]] {{Cost|3}} [[Village]]. |
In a vacuum, Ironmonger is at its best when it’s discarding Victory cards, and at its least helpful when it is hitting Action cards. But of course, a Village is a Village, and if you need a Village you’ll still be happy to pay {{Cost|4}} for it. | In a vacuum, Ironmonger is at its best when it’s discarding Victory cards, and at its least helpful when it is hitting Action cards. But of course, a Village is a Village, and if you need a Village you’ll still be happy to pay {{Cost|4}} for it. | ||
− | The key, though, is that although Ironmonger never hurts your deck, you shouldn’t try to set expectations for it. If you read “Ironmonger is at its best when it’s discarding Victory cards” and conclude that you should do nothing but buy Victory cards and Ironmonger, well, you run into the same problem you do with Crossroads: you are constantly drawing a lot of cards, but they are just all green cards anyway! And if you try to use Ironmonger as a Village, it’s not really as reliable as just a simple {{Cost|3}} vanilla Village. | + | The key, though, is that although Ironmonger never hurts your deck, you shouldn’t try to set expectations for it. If you read “Ironmonger is at its best when it’s discarding Victory cards” and conclude that you should do nothing but buy Victory cards and Ironmonger, well, you run into the same problem you do with [[Crossroads]]: you are constantly drawing a lot of cards, but they are just all green cards anyway! And if you try to use Ironmonger as a Village, it’s not really as reliable as just a simple {{Cost|3}} vanilla Village. |
− | What Ironmonger really is is a kind of weakened-but-more-reliable Tribute. You can’t really count on what it’s going to do for you, but you can count on the fact that it won’t screw you over. No matter what you’ll get something decent. | + | What Ironmonger really is is a kind of weakened-but-more-reliable [[Tribute]]. You can’t really count on what it’s going to do for you, but you can count on the fact that it won’t screw you over. No matter what you’ll get something decent. And it's a [[cantrip]], making it a far safer play, albeit with less potential upside. |
==== Ironmonger and dual type cards ==== | ==== Ironmonger and dual type cards ==== | ||
Line 37: | Line 39: | ||
Of course, like Tribute, Ironmonger gets way better with dual-type cards. | Of course, like Tribute, Ironmonger gets way better with dual-type cards. | ||
− | Victory/Action: +2 Cards, +2 Actions | + | *Victory/Action: +2 Cards, +2 Actions |
− | Victory/Treasure: +2 Cards, +1 Action, +{{Cost|1}} | + | *Victory/Treasure: +2 Cards, +1 Action, +{{Cost|1}} |
Both of these are strictly better than Lab. | Both of these are strictly better than Lab. | ||
Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
So Ironmonger is always good for your deck. That means you should always be buying it, right? | So Ironmonger is always good for your deck. That means you should always be buying it, right? | ||
− | Not really. | + | Not really. Like [[Spy]] — it’s a decent card, can’t really hurt your deck, but you won’t win the game buying nothing but Spies. Like the Looking Glass, you can’t just stand still in Dominion: if you aren’t moving towards the finish, you may as well be moving backwards. The opportunity cost of Ironmonger is passing up a chance at [[Bridge]], or [[Throne Room]], or some other powerful card that is pushing you towards endgame. |
− | That being said, Ironmonger tends to be a bit better than most other spammable cantrips, because early in your engine build, Ironmonger is likely to hit Copper and | + | That being said, Ironmonger tends to be a bit better than most other spammable cantrips, because early in your engine build, Ironmonger is likely to hit [[Copper]] and [[Estate]]s, cycling your deck a bit and giving you the more powerful effects; later, as you trim your deck, set up filtering, and/or increase action density, Ironmonger gives you the +Actions you need. |
The basic takeaway, though, is that Ironmonger in an engine works much better with a gainer, so that you’re not giving up the opportunity cost of buying a different {{Cost|4}}. | The basic takeaway, though, is that Ironmonger in an engine works much better with a gainer, so that you’re not giving up the opportunity cost of buying a different {{Cost|4}}. | ||
Line 54: | Line 56: | ||
=== Synergies/Combos === | === Synergies/Combos === | ||
− | In addition to the above, Ironmonger works well with cards that care about the top card of your deck. Mystic is the obvious choice but there may be others (Lookout, perhaps). | + | In addition to the above, Ironmonger works well with cards that care about the top card of your deck. [[Mystic]] is the obvious choice but there may be others ([[Lookout]], perhaps). |
=== Antisynergies === | === Antisynergies === | ||
− | Like Tribute, Ironmonger does not work well with | + | Like Tribute, Ironmonger does not work well with [[Curser]]s, since hitting a curse reduces Ironmonger to a straight cantrip (which is worse than [[Vagrant]], a {{Cost|2}}). It’s a mixed bag with [[Looter]]s; hitting Ruins is a Village plus Ruins filter, which isn’t bad for a {{Cost|4}} but it isn’t great. More important is that in most cases you’re likely better off just going for the Looter ([[Marauder]]/[[Cultist]]) or ignoring it ([[Death Cart]], unless of course there’s a Death Cart enabler on board) than comboing it with Ironmonger. That being said, Ironmonger is a strong choice if you are building an engine that ignores the available Looter attacks. |
== Trivia == | == Trivia == |
Revision as of 02:34, 14 November 2012
Ironmonger | |
---|---|
Info | |
Cost | |
Type(s) | Action |
Kingdom card? | Yes |
Set | Dark Ages |
Illustrator(s) | Dennis Lohausen |
Card text | |
+1 Card +1 Action Reveal the top card of your deck; you may discard it. Either way, if it is an... Action card, +1 Action Treasure card, + Victory card, +1 Card. |
Ironmonger is an Action card from Dark Ages. It is always a cantrip, but it lets you reveal the top card of your deck and get an Ironworks-like bonus depending on what card you revealed. Ironmonger can be a Village, a Laboratory, or a Peddler depending on what it finds.
Contents |
FAQ
Official FAQ
- First you draw a card, then you reveal the top card of your deck, then you either discard that card or put it back on top of your deck.
- Then you get bonuses based on the types of the card you revealed.
- A card with 2 types gives you both bonuses; for example, if you revealed Harem (from Intrigue), you would both draw a card and get +.
Other Rules clarifications
Strategy Article
Original article incorporating analysis from mischiefmaker and DrFlux.
By itself, Ironmonger is surprisingly strong. Solo play suggests that straight Ironmonger-Money is about equivalent to Smithy-Big Money: 14-17 turns to get to 4 Provinces and some Duchies.
In a more diverse deck, Ironmonger is sort of like three different cards, depending on what it hits:
Treasure: +1 Card, +1 Action, +, could discard Copper. This card is like a Laboratory in a way: you are drawing the Copper and discarding it, but you still get the +. If you aren’t drawing Copper, then it’s about equivalent to Peddler, but with some info about your next card. On its own it’d probably cost about -.
Victory: +2 Cards, +1 Action, can discard a Victory card. This is strictly better than a Laboratory, since it’s sort of like +3 Cards / +1 Action with the discard. So on its own it’d cost at least .
Action: +1 Card, +2 Actions, could but probably won’t discard an Action. This is a Village, and probably not enough bonus on top of the Village to differentiate it from a typical vanilla Village.
In a vacuum, Ironmonger is at its best when it’s discarding Victory cards, and at its least helpful when it is hitting Action cards. But of course, a Village is a Village, and if you need a Village you’ll still be happy to pay for it.
The key, though, is that although Ironmonger never hurts your deck, you shouldn’t try to set expectations for it. If you read “Ironmonger is at its best when it’s discarding Victory cards” and conclude that you should do nothing but buy Victory cards and Ironmonger, well, you run into the same problem you do with Crossroads: you are constantly drawing a lot of cards, but they are just all green cards anyway! And if you try to use Ironmonger as a Village, it’s not really as reliable as just a simple vanilla Village.
What Ironmonger really is is a kind of weakened-but-more-reliable Tribute. You can’t really count on what it’s going to do for you, but you can count on the fact that it won’t screw you over. No matter what you’ll get something decent. And it's a cantrip, making it a far safer play, albeit with less potential upside.
Ironmonger and dual type cards
Of course, like Tribute, Ironmonger gets way better with dual-type cards.
- Victory/Action: +2 Cards, +2 Actions
- Victory/Treasure: +2 Cards, +1 Action, +
Both of these are strictly better than Lab.
Ironmonger and opportunity cost
So Ironmonger is always good for your deck. That means you should always be buying it, right?
Not really. Like Spy — it’s a decent card, can’t really hurt your deck, but you won’t win the game buying nothing but Spies. Like the Looking Glass, you can’t just stand still in Dominion: if you aren’t moving towards the finish, you may as well be moving backwards. The opportunity cost of Ironmonger is passing up a chance at Bridge, or Throne Room, or some other powerful card that is pushing you towards endgame.
That being said, Ironmonger tends to be a bit better than most other spammable cantrips, because early in your engine build, Ironmonger is likely to hit Copper and Estates, cycling your deck a bit and giving you the more powerful effects; later, as you trim your deck, set up filtering, and/or increase action density, Ironmonger gives you the +Actions you need.
The basic takeaway, though, is that Ironmonger in an engine works much better with a gainer, so that you’re not giving up the opportunity cost of buying a different .
Synergies/Combos
In addition to the above, Ironmonger works well with cards that care about the top card of your deck. Mystic is the obvious choice but there may be others (Lookout, perhaps).
Antisynergies
Like Tribute, Ironmonger does not work well with Cursers, since hitting a curse reduces Ironmonger to a straight cantrip (which is worse than Vagrant, a ). It’s a mixed bag with Looters; hitting Ruins is a Village plus Ruins filter, which isn’t bad for a but it isn’t great. More important is that in most cases you’re likely better off just going for the Looter (Marauder/Cultist) or ignoring it (Death Cart, unless of course there’s a Death Cart enabler on board) than comboing it with Ironmonger. That being said, Ironmonger is a strong choice if you are building an engine that ignores the available Looter attacks.
Trivia
Secret History